As the Legislature printed it
DIVISION 4. WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND INSURANCE [3200 - 6002] · PART 2. COMPUTATION OF COMPENSATION [4451 - 4856] · CHAPTER 2. Compensation Schedules [4550 - 4856] · ARTICLE 2.3. Medical Provider Networks [4616 - 4616.7]
How panels applied this section
Newest released decisions whose legal-standard extraction named this section. Each quotes the passage and links to the official PDF. Unofficial guide — not legal advice.
- ADJ12308686 · 2026-06-11 · Los Angeles District Office§ 4616
Determinative passage · p.5The MPN access standards measure adequacy for brain-injury conditions according to the availability of recognized medical specialists. There is no board-certified specialty titled "brain injury specialist" in the manner that neurology exists as an established specialty. A boardcertified neurologist possesses the medical qualifications necessary to diagnose, treat, and manage brain injuries including post-concussion syndrome and post-traumatic vertigo. Defendant therefore satisfied its obligation under section 4600 when it provided applicant with the names of three qualified neurologists located within the required geographic boundaries.
Defendant met requirements by providing access to three neurologists within the MPN for applicant's brain injury condition.
Official decision · page 5 → - ADJ19137360 · 2026-03-23 · Los Angeles District Office§ 4616
Determinative passage · p.12No, Applicant may not ignore Defendant's MPN and obtain evaluation and treatment from a non-MPN provider once Applicant has been advised of their rights and responsibilities to treat within Defendant's MPN, as indicated below. Once Applicant has been advised of their rights and responsibilities to treat within Defendant's MPN, lien claimant, standing in Applicant's shoes, has the burden to prove that there was some kind of denial of care that would entitle Applicant to treat outside of that MPN pursuant to the Knight decision (Knight v. UPS (2006) 71 Cal. Comp. Cases 1423 (en banc)) and pursuant to Labor Code § 4616.3(b). As indicated below, there was no showing of any denial of care by Defendant to Applicant. The services of lien claimant, Physical Rehab Services, would be considered self-procured treatment and Defendant is not responsible for reimbursement for those services.
Applicant was advised of MPN rights and responsibilities; no denial of care established.
Official decision · page 12 → - ADJ8112676 · 2025-12-16 · Los Angeles District Office§ 4616
Determinative passage · p.3Section 4616(b)(4) provides that, "[a] determination of the administrative director may be reviewed only by an appeal of the determination of the administrative director filed as an original proceeding before the reconsideration unit of the workers' compensation appeals board on the same grounds and within the same time limits after issuance of the determination as would be applicable to a petition for reconsideration of a decision of a workers' compensation administrative law judge." (§ 4616(b)(4).) WCAB Rule 10560 provides that, "[w]here the Labor Code provides that the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board has jurisdiction over appeals from or enforcement of an order, any aggrieved party may appeal or seek to enforce an order issued by the Division of Workers' Compensation Administrative Director or the Director of Industrial Relations by filing
Applied to determine the appealability and timeliness of the petitions.
Official decision · page 3 → - ADJ15987729 · 2024-10-14 · Los Angeles District Office§ 4616
Determinative passage · p.6Labor Code Section 4616(b) (1) provides in pertinent part, "Upon a showing that the medical provider network was approved or deemed approved by the administrative director, there shall be a conclusive presumption on the part of the appeals board that the medical provider network was validly formed."
Applied to uphold the validity of Defendant's MPN.
Official decision · page 6 → - ADJ10740002 · 2024-07-23 · Oakland District Office§ 4616
Determinative passage · p.6"Ancillary services" are defined as the "provision of medical services or goods as allowed in Labor Code section 4600 by a non-physician, including, but not limited to, interpreter services." (Tit 8, Cal. Code Regs, § 9767.1(a)(1).) Therefore, defendants are entitled to include interpreters related to medical treatment in their MPNs, and that defendants will not be liable for the costs of those interpreters if an applicant impermissibly obtains interpreting services outside of that MPN.
Defendant's MPN included interpreter services as ancillary services, and lien claimant was not part of the MPN, so defendant was not liable for lien payment.
Official decision · page 6 → - ADJ11289849 · 2024-06-18 · Long Beach District Office§ 4616
Determinative passage · p.7The requirements and regulations for the establishment of a medical provider network are outlined in Labor Code § 4616. Pursuant to Section 4616(b)(1), "upon a showing that the medical provider network was approved...by the administrative director, there shall be a conclusive presumption on the part of the appeals board that the medical provider network was validly formed."
The Board found a conclusive presumption of valid MPN formation upon showing administrative director approval.
Official decision · page 7 → - ADJ808475 · 2023-08-25 · Van Nuys District Office§ 4616
Determinative passage · p.2The injured employee may be transferred into the MPN for medical treatment unless certain exceptions apply. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 9767.9(a).) One exception allows an additional year of treatment outside the MPN when the injured employee has a serious chronic condition. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 9767.9(e)(2).) Applicant was provided with an additional year of treatment outside of the MPN due to his serious chronic condition. (Report, pp. 3-4.)
Defendant followed the required steps for transfer to MPN, and applicant received proper notice and additional time for treatment outside the MPN due to a serious chronic condition.
Official decision · page 2 → - ADJ14808720 · 2022-05-16 · Van Nuys District Office§ 4616
Determinative passage · p.3(4) Approval of a plan may be denied, revoked, or suspended if the medical provider network fails to meet the requirements of this article. Any person contending that a medical provider network is not validly constituted may petition the administrative director to suspend or revoke the approval of the medical provider network.... Unless suspended or revoked by the administrative director, the administrative director's approval of a medical provider network shall be binding on all persons and all courts. A determination of the administrative director may be reviewed only by an appeal of the determination of the administrative director filed as an original proceeding before the reconsideration unit of the workers' compensation appeals board on the same grounds and within the same time limits after issuance of the determination as would be applicable to a petition for reconsideration of a decision of a workers' compensation administrative law judge.... (Lab. Code, § 4616, emphasis added.)2
Applied to determine that the WCAB lacks jurisdiction to declare the MPN invalid once approved by the administrative director.
Official decision · page 3 →
All 15 decisions naming § 4616 →
The rules written under this section
A statute says what is owed; Title 8 says by when, on what form, and what happens if the deadline passes. These name § 4616as what they implement.
- 8 CCR § 9767.1Medical Provider Networks -- Definitions.
- 8 CCR § 9767.2Review of Medical Provider Network Application.
- 8 CCR § 9767.3Application for a Medical Provider Network Plan.
- 8 CCR § 9767.4Cover Page for Medical Provider Network Application or Plan for Reapproval.
- 8 CCR § 9767.6Treatment and Change of Physicians Within MPN
- 8 CCR § 9767.7Second and Third Opinions
- 8 CCR § 9767.9Transfer of Ongoing Care into the MPN.
- 8 CCR § 9767.13Denial of Approval of Application or Reapproval; Re-Evaluation.
- 8 CCR § 9767.14Probation, Suspension or Revocation of Medical Provider Network Plan; Hearing.
- 8 CCR § 9767.15Compliance with Current MPN Regulations; Reapproval.
- 8 CCR § 9767.16Medical Provider Network Complaints.
- 8 CCR § 9767.16.5DWC Medical Provider Network Complaint Form 9767.16.5.
- 8 CCR § 9767.17Petition for Suspension or Revocation of a Medical Provider Network.
- 8 CCR § 9767.17.5DWC Petition for Suspension or Revocation of a Medical Provider Network Form
- 8 CCR § 9767.18Random Reviews.
- 8 CCR § 9767.19Administrative Penalty Schedule; Hearing, Mitigation and Appeal.
- 8 CCR § 9780.1Employee's Predesignation of Personal Physician.
- 8 CCR § 9782Notice to Employee of Right to Choose Physician.
- 8 CCR § 10101.1Claim File--Contents.
- 8 CCR § 10139Workers' Compensation Claim Form (DWC 1) and Notice of Potential Eligibility.
- 8 CCR § 10580Petition Appealing Medical Provider Network Determination of the Administrative Director.
- 8 CCR § 10959Petition Appealing Medical Provider Network Determination of the Administrative Director. [Renumbered]repealed
Also on this
Unofficial guide — not legal advice. The statute is the state’s text. The quotes are litigated applications, not a prediction.
About California Labor Code § 4616
What is California Labor Code § 4616?
Labor Code § 4616 sits in ARTICLE 2.3. Medical Provider Networks [4616 - 4616.7]. The statute on this page begins: (a) (1) An insurer, employer, or entity that provides physician network services may establish or modify a medical provider network for the. The official display is on LegInfo; this is a reprint.
Did WCAB panels apply Labor Code § 4616 in this corpus?
This corpus has 15 released decisions whose extracted legal standards named § 4616. Quotes and PDFs are on this page. That is not every case in California that ever cited the section.