The whole released corpus, not the closest twelve. Filter by issue and outcome, kind, year, office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, the disposition with its page, and the official PDF. To search by a fact pattern, use /explore.
Can I browse all released California WCAB panel decisions?+−
Yes. This list is the released corpus, filterable by issue and outcome, kind, year, district office, Labor Code section, or holding. Each row is the ADJ number, disposition, and official PDF — not a claimant name.
Should I search by facts instead?+−
If you have a dispute to paste, use /explore. This page is for scanning or filtering the whole set, not ranking by similarity.
Why is an older panel missing?+−
Most of the ordinary panel archive here starts in 2021. En banc files go further back. Coverage and the gaps are listed on /california/coverage. Filtered views are not separate indexable pages.
Published panel decisions, almost all since 2021: the litigated tail of a system that mostly settles. Issues and outcomes were extracted by AI and released only where the source passage checked. A row is a decision, never a claimant. Not legal advice.
The WCAB grants applicant's Petition for Reconsideration and defers issuance of a final decision pending further review of the merits and the entire record.
The WCAB affirmed the Findings and Order except it amended the order to find that the MPN-IMR report from Dr. Michael Smith is substantial evidence that applicant is entitled to left hip surgery as a diagnostic procedure; Dr. Smith cannot address causation or medical need on an industrial basis; and Dr. Smith's report may not be sent to QME Dr. Charles Roland for review.
The WCAB granted the Petition for Reconsideration, rescinded the finding allowing the deposition of Dr. Lisa Pitino, and otherwise affirmed the October 3, 2023 Findings and Award allowing the deposition of the person most knowledgeable at Ericsson regarding earnings and earning capacity.
Petition for reconsideration denied; the August 21, 2023 Findings and Order on Appeal of Administrative Director's IMR Determination is affirmed, rescinding the June 20, 2023 IMR determination and remanding for another IMR by a different reviewer.
WCAB affirmed the September 12, 2022 Findings and Order denying defendant's Petition for Reconsideration and upholding the remand for a new IMR review.
Findings and Order of 2021-10-25 rescinded; substituted findings that applicant is entitled to continued inpatient treatment until defendant establishes change in condition and treating physician agrees on care plan; matter returned for further proceedings
Petition for reconsideration granted; Findings and Order on Appeal of Administrative Director's IMR Determination rescinded; dispute remanded to Administrative Director for submission to a different independent review organization or reviewer.
Petition for reconsideration granted; Findings of Fact and Order of May 28, 2021 rescinded; IMR determination found plainly erroneous and in excess of AD's powers; dispute remanded to AD for new IMR by different organization or reviewer.
Findings and Award issued by the WCJ on December 1, 2020 is rescinded and the matter is returned to the trial level for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
The Appeals Board denied the Petition for Reconsideration, affirming the lack of jurisdiction to review the UR and IMR decisions and rejecting applicant's contentions of bad faith or improper UR.
The Appeals Board rescinded the WCJ's February 18, 2014 dismissal of the IMR appeal for lack of verification and returned the case to the trial level for further proceedings and a new decision by the WCJ.
The WCAB en banc rescinded the WCJ's September 23, 2013 decision and returned the matter to the WCJ for further proceedings to determine whether the spinal surgery is reasonably required.